| Pages: [1] |
1. ECM: OP or not, it does not belong. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I posted an idea on how to make ECM better https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=263600&find=unread I think it should be made to be the opposite of sensor damps. It prevents you from locking people close to you, i go into ...
- by Commander Ted - at 2013.07.29 03:16:00
|
2. Is it time to admit webs were overnerfed? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Muad 'dib wrote: why shouldnt a web = a web ?!?!?!?!?! webs work for cruiser and BC, but for BS or frigates they are underwhelming and combine a cross size difference its basically a waste of a slot in most cases. i love the pirate ships wi...
- by Commander Ted - at 2013.07.08 20:21:00
|
3. Is it time to admit webs were overnerfed? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Muad 'dib wrote: why are you assuming the only thing on the field for either side with tackle at any time is a boosted rapier/arazu. I am not, I am simply pointing out that your change will leave you with omgwtfbbq tacklers from 100km away...
- by Commander Ted - at 2013.07.08 19:47:00
|
4. Is it time to admit webs were overnerfed? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Muad 'dib wrote: nah cant do that, by the same rational falcons jam themselves HOWEVER being more susceptible to them.... that i like.. Every web you have active makes any web on you Xx and strong .....same as if: every time a falcon jams i...
- by Commander Ted - at 2013.07.08 19:08:00
|
5. Is it time to admit webs were overnerfed? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
What if some webs had there strength boosted and slowed down both the webber and webee? 90% speed reduction to the target and 60% speed reduction to the user? Now if your a slower ship you can stop a fast ship but at the cost of your own speed? I...
- by Commander Ted - at 2013.07.08 18:55:00
|
6. Is it time to admit webs were overnerfed? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Diesel47 wrote: Rofl, are you terrible or something? Brawlers reeling in kiters? Show me on the doll where the pro kiter touched you (and your pathetic gang). What is your problem? There really isn't a way for a brawling ship to catc...
- by Commander Ted - at 2013.07.08 03:40:00
|
7. Is it time to admit webs were overnerfed? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Also my idea is to add a 20km 30% strength web. Now kiting ships can be slowly reeled in by some brawlers. However those brawlers than fit these webs will have a competitive disadvantage over close range brawlers that carry 60% webs, since you wo...
- by Commander Ted - at 2013.07.07 21:16:00
|
8. Is it time to admit webs were overnerfed? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Harvey James wrote: christ as if having the option of 60% webs on rapiers with 100km range with links or faction webs.... i would think a nerf to web strength and maybe even range is more balanced than the other way around. Also nerf the pirate...
- by Commander Ted - at 2013.07.07 21:12:00
|
9. EFT v2.13.4 - Incursion 1.4.1 - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Darkheart Inflecto wrote: EFT is missing the Christmas gift ships... Sukuuvestaa Heron etc. why would it have those, they are exact carbon copies of the normal versions.
- by Commander Ted - at 2013.02.26 02:58:00
|
10. Pve Taranis fit - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Ive decided to do the Angel epic arc in 0.0 and according to all the guides these missions recommend ceptors to get past camps and for doing the missions. So I go on battleclinic to find a cookie cuttter fit and they all suck it seems. So I had to...
- by Commander Ted - at 2010.12.14 19:55:00
|
11. Solo lowsec GATEGUN TANKING (kinda) FALCON - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Rajere Originally by: Commander Ted let it be known that this is mainly a experimental idea. This would have also been useful when me and my buds tried killing a armageddon sitting off station in a .4 system. We were...
- by Commander Ted - at 2010.09.01 22:56:00
|
12. Solo lowsec GATEGUN TANKING (kinda) FALCON - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Rajere Originally by: Commander Ted Thorax may have trouble if somebody tries to chase you through the gate with friends ready to gank on the other side. Plus I can burn to a hauler fast enough to catch it anyway. Wi...
- by Commander Ted - at 2010.09.01 01:45:00
|
13. Solo lowsec GATEGUN TANKING (kinda) FALCON - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
let it be known that this is mainly a experimental idea. This would have also been useful when me and my buds tried killing a armageddon sitting off station in a .4 system. We were 2 harbys and a myrm and I was thinking if my falcon could just han...
- by Commander Ted - at 2010.09.01 01:33:00
|
14. Solo lowsec GATEGUN TANKING (kinda) FALCON - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Thorax may have trouble if somebody tries to chase you through the gate with friends ready to gank on the other side. Plus I can burn to a hauler fast enough to catch it anyway. With all level 5 skills and 3 intertial stabilizers a badger mark II ...
- by Commander Ted - at 2010.09.01 01:26:00
|
15. Solo lowsec GATEGUN TANKING (kinda) FALCON - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Magoozle you have very little resists at all, the guns will tear you a new one before you know it tbh plus you cant cloak when they are shooting you as you're targetted :P yes but I can hide cloaked on a gate waiting for ...
- by Commander Ted - at 2010.09.01 01:17:00
|
16. Solo lowsec GATEGUN TANKING (kinda) FALCON - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Now I know what your going to say, "No" but hear me out! First off if you don't think this is a idiotic idea in the first place then your saying use a rook. Well a rook may be a bigger dps beat but it has less powergrid so less tank. Now your goin...
- by Commander Ted - at 2010.09.01 00:42:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |